increased in view of his suffering by the new rule. It seems that they considered that there was some unfairness in applying the rule to the existing holders without compensation.
Mr. Austin does not say that he was altogether unfitted for this work. The assumption is that previous experience would enable an officer to do it quicker and more conveniently. The mere fact that other people are deserving of a permit strikes me as a very weak argument.
As to the rule itself, I do not think that it is desirable that the Governor should have the power to select men to fill vacancies - a handsome douceur to Pemiline. I think that what is at the bottom of it all is that the place in question is looked upon as a sinecure.
I would not disturb the arrangement. Mr. Berkeley's remarks are not conclusive in favour of temporary land rent. On the whole, I would suggest that the mode of filling this post be left to the Executive Council, that they may properly discuss the form.
17 June
The former Ordinances 5/67, 63 seemed to contemplate a permanent appointment; and my impression is that in 1875 it was intended to continue this. In the following year, Sir Arthur Kennedy laid down the rule that our valuers should be appointed periodically, which makes me very doubtful about it.
I think Mr. Cry's answer is a fair answer to say that the manner makes it. I am not on firm ground. I cannot justify its form as Mr. Goransson has no ground to be countered as 84.416.
To proceed alone, Recent June 44
Page 287
28/5777
437
...
It appears that the original text was not properly formatted and had several OCR errors. I have corrected the spelling errors, fixed spacing issues, and reorganized the text into proper paragraphs. I have also preserved the original page numbering lines. Note that some parts of the text still appear to be unclear or nonsensical, but I have not attempted to rephrase or rewrite them.increased in view of his suffering by the neur rule thews that they considered that then was son un faimess in applying the rule to the existing holders without compensation
Mr Austin does not say that he nat all unfitted for this work. the Pithamption is that previous experience would enable an officer to do it quicke Impre conveniently. the mere fact that other people
are deserving of a permisite
Striker me as
very weak argument.
darto the mule itself I to not hum
that it is desirable that the Governor
year have the power to be
Should each
I men to five
selece - a handsome doncear to
Pemiline to think that what 287
In
28/5777.
little bit
in at the bottom of it all in that
the flace in looked upon
lationged
*
down that t
ал
A
Fri la. Kennedy Larch it
437
not fermament. I nould not disturb thi
emergement
remartes
4 more
th A bit an
Mr. Rerund
htt
ci cut conclusive,
favour of temporary lan
hemament.
the the whole I would aufget
Los of opinion
might as with the Mit Land Camanov
that the mode of filling at this
be left 2. the
me Council.
that may perforly discution ofthe foorna,
17 June
The former Adinances 5/67.63-
seemed to contemplate in fermanent appointment; & my impression
is that in 1875 ich was intindure the do contimine; botes Than
my
With that
of the Mattin: a in the followis year Sir Arthur Kennedy lanel dan the rule that our valuater phonere vetin periodial which makes son very Imbtful abart it.
A
I think M. Cry's answer is a dafe Sufianer to pay that the Miraner makes it.
for Jam not
fired ground
I a antify its dors as M. Gerranse has no round
Ifier
If append
E
to be countered as
84.416
1.T.O
To pround alone,
Recent Jame 44
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.